Социальное влияние [Майкл Ляйппе] (fb2) читать постранично, страница - 260

682–687.

Wells, G. L., Leippe, M.R., and Ostrom,T.M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 285–293.

Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. С L., and Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440–448.

Wells, G. L., and Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells and E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G. L., and Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230.

Wells, G. L., Wrightsman, L. S., and Miene, P. K. (1985). The timing of the defense opening statement: Don't wait until the evidence is in. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 758–772.

Wilson, T. D.., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., and Lisle, D. J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude — behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 22, pp. 287–343). New York: Academic Press.

Wilson, T. D., and Linville, P. W. (1982). Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: Attribution therapy revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 367–376.

Wilson, W., and Miller, H. (1968). Repetition, order of presentation, and timing of arguments and measures as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 184–188.

Winett, R. A., Kagel, J. H., Battalia, R. C, and Winkler, R.. С. (1978). Effects of monetary rebates, feedback, and information on residential electricity conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 73–80.

Winett, R. A., Neale, M. S., and Grier, H..С. (1979). Effects of self — monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 173–184.

Wolf, S., and Montgomery, D. A. (1977). Effects of inadmissible evidence and level of judicial admonishment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7,205–219.

Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798–810.

Wood, W., Kallgren,C.A., and Priesler, R. M. (1985). Access to attitude — relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 73–85.

Wood, W., Wong,F. K, and Сhachere J. 0.(1990). Effects of media violence on viewers' aggression in unconstrained social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, in press.

Wrightsman, L. S. (1987). Psychology and the legal system. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

Wu, C, and Shaffer, D. R. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677–688.

Yates, S. M., and Aronson, E. (1983). A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. American Psychologist, 38, 435–444.

Yukl, G., and Falbe, С. М. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132–140.

Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitude effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 9 (2, pt. 2).

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

Zanna, M. P. (1990). Message receptivity: A new look at the old problem of open — vs. closed — min — dedness. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advertising exposure, memory, and choice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zanna, M. P., Kiesler, С A., and Pilkonis, P. A. (1970). Positive and negative attitudinal affect established by classical conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 321–328.

Zanna, M. P., and Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar — Tal and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ziesel, H., and Diamond, S.S. (1976). The jury selection in the Mitchell — Stans conspiracy trial. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1, 151–174.

Zillman, D., and Bryant, L. (1974). Effect of residual excitation on the motivational response to provocation and delayed aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30,782–791.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1960). Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 86–94.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The cognitive control of motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1971). Coercion and compliance. The psychology of police confessions. In С Perruci and M. Pilisuk (Eds.), The triple revolution emerging (pp. 492–508). Boston: Little, Brown.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1977). Shyness: What is it, what to do about it. Reading, MA: Addison — Wesley.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1988). Psychology and life (12th ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Zimbardo, P. G., Weisenberg, M., Firestone, I., and Levy,B. (1965). Communicator effectiveness in producing public conformity and private attitude change. Journal of Personality, 33, 233–256.

Zuckerman,M., DePaulo, В., Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.

Zullow, H. M., Oettingen, G., Peterson, C, and Seligman, M. E. P. (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style in the historical record. American Psychologist, 43, 673–682.

Примечания

1

На русском языке книга выпущена издательством «Питер» в 1999 г.

(обратно)

2

Look before you leap — английская пословица, которую можно перевести как «Сначала посмотри, а потом прыгай». (Прим. перев.)

(обратно)

3

Когда изменения в одном наборе данных связаны с изменениями в соответствующем другом наборе (например, результаты двух тестов, полученные одним человеком), то на языке математики такую связь отражает коэффициент корреляции, или r. Его величина может изменяться в диапазоне от -1,0 до +1,0. Когда r = 0, то распределения данных из двух наборов не связаны между собой. Положительное значение r говорит о том, что изменения данных каждого набора происходят в одинаковом направлении: с увеличением А происходит увеличение Б. Отрицательное значение r указывает на то, что А и Б изменяются в противоположных направлениях. Если величина r приближается к +1,0 или к -1,0, то становится возможным с высокой степенью вероятности прогнозировать одно событие, исходя из известных сведений о другом, т. е. объяснять изменения одного набора данных наблюдений, основываясь на знаниях об изменении другого.

(обратно)

4

Дальнейшее содержание этого приложения в основном